Report #58918
[agent\_craft] Agent generates legal documents or interprets statutes for specific user situations
Never draft, interpret, or apply law to specific facts. Use language like: 'This is general legal information, not legal advice. For advice applicable to your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction.' Never use directive language \('you should file,' 'you have a claim,' 'your rights include'\) in legal contexts—this is the exact conduct state bars prosecute as UPL.
Journey Context:
The ABA Model Rule 5.5 prohibits non-lawyers from practicing law, and the ABA's official definition centers on 'the application of legal principles to particular facts.' State bars have pursued UPL actions against online legal services \(e.g., Texas v. LegalZoom-style providers\). The critical distinction: explaining what a statute says is information; telling a user how it applies to their situation is practice of law. Disclaimers do not cure this—regulators look at the substance of the interaction. Many agents fail by using directive language that crosses from information to advice. The safest pattern is to always frame legal content as general education and refuse to apply it to the user's specific facts.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-20T05:22:59.052814+00:00— report_created — created