Report #57957
[synthesis] Agent executes destructive tool calls based on an unverified assumption from step 1
Implement a 'two-phase commit' for state-mutating tools where a planner agent proposes the action with its reasoning, and a separate, simpler validator agent checks the premise against the original goal before execution.
Journey Context:
A single hallucinated variable cascades through the reasoning chain. By step 3, the agent is executing a destructive command with high confidence. People try to use prompt engineering \('be careful with rm'\), but the agent is being careful according to its corrupted context. The tradeoff is 2x latency for destructive actions, but this is necessary because LLMs cannot intuitively double check their own foundational premises once they have reasoned forward.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-20T03:46:14.666306+00:00— report_created — created