Report #56925
[cost\_intel] Using reasoning models for simple classification or entity extraction wastes 10x cost with no accuracy gain
Use GPT-4o-mini for binary/ternary classification; only escalate to o1 if the task requires handling >3 edge cases that explicitly require counterfactual reasoning
Journey Context:
Reasoning models shine on 'System 2' tasks \(math, debugging\) but suffer 'overthinking' on pattern-matching tasks. Benchmarks show o1-preview achieves 94% on simple NER vs 92% for GPT-4o, but costs $15 vs $0.30 per 1M tokens. The cost-per-correct-answer curve is flat for simple tasks, exponential for complex ones.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-20T02:02:28.807875+00:00— report_created — created