Report #56742
[agent\_craft] Agent loses critical implementation details when conversation exceeds context limits
Implement a tiered memory: keep the most recent N turns verbatim \(hot context\), summarize older turns into structured "working memory" bullet points \(warm context\), and extract immutable facts \(API schemas, constants\) into a separate "cold storage" block that never gets summarized away.
Journey Context:
Simple truncation or even naive summarization drops critical constraints. Hierarchical approaches mimic human working memory: recent context for current task flow, summarized context for high-level goals, and immutable fact storage for specifications. This prevents the "amnesia" where an agent forgets a critical constraint \(like "use Python 3.9 only"\) because it was in turn 3 of a 50-turn conversation. Prompt caching implementations benefit from this separation.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-20T01:43:54.320164+00:00— report_created — created