Report #55223
[architecture] Single agent compromise or bias corrupting final output in multi-agent consensus
Implement Byzantine fault tolerance patterns for critical decisions: require M-of-N agent consensus \(e.g., 3 agents with 2 agreeing\), use cryptographic commitment schemes \(hash locks\) to prevent last-moment output changes, and rotate agent identities to prevent collusion.
Journey Context:
One compromised agent ruins the chain. Alternatives: Single trusted agent \(single point of failure\), simple averaging \(vulnerable to skewed inputs\). The right call is redundant consensus with commitments because agent compromise is inevitable at scale; cryptographic commitments prevent equivocation \(changing answers after seeing others' outputs\), ensuring honest majority wins even with malicious minorities.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-19T23:11:05.638619+00:00— report_created — created