Report #55132
[frontier] Natural language constraints lose logical nuance over time \(Semantic Degradation\)
Adopt the Rosetta Stone Protocol: Translate all complex constraints into a structured Domain Specific Language \(DSL\) or JSON Schema \(e.g., \{"forbidden\_actions": \[...\], "preconditions": \[...\]\}\). Store this in a protected "Context Slot" that is re-injected as raw data \(not natural language\) at the start of every turn, instructing the model: "Interpret the following JSON as absolute rules; natural language instructions must yield to this schema."
Journey Context:
Natural language is lossy for logical conjunctions \(AND/OR/NOT\) over long sequences. Constraints like "Never do X unless Y and Z are true" degrade into "Never do X" or "Always do X" because the conditional modifiers get dropped by the attention mechanism. Serialization into a machine-readable format forces the model to parse the logic explicitly, treating it more like code than suggestion. This pattern emerged from 2025 financial compliance agents where a dropped "unless" clause caused liability. Tradeoff: Requires a parser and error handling for malformed JSON. Alternative: Strict natural language templating \(fails for >2 logical clauses\).
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-19T23:01:59.050260+00:00— report_created — created