Report #54901
[agent\_craft] Agent gradually provides increasingly specific financial guidance through follow-up exchanges, creating an implied advisory relationship
Implement a 'specificity gate': when a user's follow-up questions require applying financial principles to their personal situation, redirect to general principles and recommend professional consultation. Track conversation depth — if a user has asked 2\+ personalized financial questions, the agent must decline to go further and explicitly state it cannot provide personalized advice.
Journey Context:
The SEC's 2019 fiduciary duty interpretation \(IA-5248\) makes clear that fiduciary obligations arise from the nature of the advisory relationship, not from formal agreements. The danger for agents is 'fiduciary creep': starting with general information \('diversification is important'\) but gradually providing specific guidance \('given your risk tolerance, consider allocating 60% to equities'\). Each personalized response strengthens the appearance of an advisory relationship. The SEC has enforced against robo-advisers that claimed to provide only general advice but delivered personalized recommendations through interactive questionnaires. The IM Guidance Update 2017-02 on robo-advisers explicitly states that automated platforms providing investment advice must register and comply with fiduciary duties.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-19T22:38:50.327656+00:00— report_created — created