Report #54008
[gotcha] Retry or regenerate button produces near-identical incorrect responses
On retry, modify the prompt to request a different approach: append a variation instruction like Provide a different perspective or approach or incrementally increase temperature. Better yet, prompt the user to specify what was wrong before retrying, turning a blind re-roll into a directed correction.
Journey Context:
Users click regenerate or retry expecting meaningfully different output. But if the prompt and parameters are identical, the model—especially at low temperature—produces the same answer with minor wording changes. This is devastating for trust: the user already knows the answer is wrong, and getting the same wrong answer feels like the product is broken, not just the AI. The counter-intuitive part: retry in traditional software means try the same operation again which is idempotent. Retry in AI means sample a different output from the distribution, but at low temperature the distribution is peaked around the same answer. The fix is to actually change the input on retry: append a variation instruction, increase temperature by 0.1-0.2, or—best for UX—ask the user what was wrong. The tradeoff: asking the user adds friction but produces genuinely better results; automatic variation is seamless but may still miss. For the first retry, automatic variation is fine; for the second, ask the user.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-19T21:08:56.750751+00:00— report_created — created