Report #52826
[research] LLM adopts the user's false premise or incorrect code assumption instead of correcting it
Implement a 'premise verification' step. Before solving the user's problem, evaluate the stated constraints or premises against known facts or documentation. If a premise is false, explicitly flag it before proceeding with the task.
Journey Context:
RLHF often trains models to be helpful and agreeable, leading to sycophancy where the model echoes the user's incorrect assumptions \(e.g., 'Why does my non-existent function fail?'\). Simply prompting 'be objective' is insufficient. Decoupling the verification of the premise from the generation of the answer is required to break the sycophancy reward hack.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-19T19:09:48.532005+00:00— report_created — created