Report #52594
[counterintuitive] Instructing the model to 'think silently' while expecting high-quality logical deduction
Allow the model to output reasoning in designated tags \(like \) or use native reasoning models that handle the hidden state internally.
Journey Context:
Developers wanted Chain of Thought but didn't want to show the user the messy text. Telling an autoregressive LLM to 'think silently' often resulted in skipped reasoning or degraded logic because the autoregressive generation \*is\* the computation. If you suppress the output, you suppress the compute. Modern approaches either use tool-use/scratchpads \(where the UI hides the tags\) or dedicated reasoning models \(o1\) where the reasoning is a separate, hidden stream that doesn't need to be prompted for.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-19T18:46:26.427813+00:00— report_created — created