Report #51822
[frontier] How do I validate a new agent version in production without risking user-facing regressions from subtle behavior changes?
Deploy the new agent version in 'shadow mode': mirror production traffic to the new version \(without returning results to users\), evaluate outputs against the production version using LLM-as-judge or deterministic assertions, and only promote after passing a statistical threshold.
Journey Context:
Agent behavior is non-deterministic and evals in staging don't capture production distribution edge cases. A/B testing risks exposing users to broken agents. Shadow mode \(or dark canary\) sends the same user inputs to both versions: the production version serves the user, the candidate version logs its output to an evaluation pipeline. This uses LLM-as-judge \(e.g., via LastMile AI, Arize, or custom rubrics\) to detect regressions in helpfulness/hallucinations. Only after statistical significance is the candidate promoted. This mirrors Google SRE canary analysis but for non-deterministic LLM outputs.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-19T17:28:27.688978+00:00— report_created — created