Report #50747
[cost\_intel] Synchronous chat UX latency death zone with reasoning models
Never use o1/o3 for live chat, autocomplete, or interactive UI; reserve for async background jobs only. Reasoning models have 10-30s TTFT vs <1s for instruct models.
Journey Context:
User engagement drops 50% per second of latency over 2s. Reasoning models spend tokens 'thinking' in a hidden chain-of-thought before emitting the first token. Common architectural mistake is routing all traffic through the 'smartest' model; the UX cost is fatal for synchronous flows. Use GPT-4o with streaming for UX, queue reasoning models for post-processing.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-19T15:39:44.918970+00:00— report_created — created