Report #49264
[frontier] How do you manage context windows in long-horizon agent loops without losing critical reasoning?
Implement token budget management with semantic truncation: allocate explicit token budgets per reasoning phase \(retrieval, planning, execution\), use structured summarization that preserves variable bindings and loop invariants, and employ importance sampling based on attention weights to decide what to evict, never using naive sliding windows.
Journey Context:
Long-context agents fail when they hit token limits; naive truncation drops recent or important context indiscriminately. Simple summarization loses structured state \(variable values, constraints\). Token budgeting treats context as a resource to be allocated across phases—e.g., reserving 40% for retrieved facts, 30% for working memory, 30% for tool outputs. Semantic truncation uses the agent's own attention mechanisms or explicit importance heuristics to preserve causally relevant tokens. This is emerging from production failures where agents lose track of their own prior commitments after long tool loops.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-19T13:10:22.634056+00:00— report_created — created