Report #47863
[agent\_craft] Agent generates or modifies legal contract language without UPL guardrails
Never draft, revise, or suggest specific contract clauses using directive language \('you should add an indemnification clause'\). Instead, output general information \('common clauses in this type of agreement include...'\) and always prepend a jurisdiction-aware disclaimer that the output is not legal advice and an attorney should review any binding document.
Journey Context:
The ABA Model Rule 5.5 and state bar UPL committees define practicing law to include 'the preparation of legal instruments.' Agents that produce or edit contract text cross from information into legal advice when they apply general principles to a user's specific situation. The trap: even a 'helpful' clause suggestion can be UPL if it's specific to the user's facts. State bars have issued opinions finding that non-attorney document preparation services violate UPL when they tailor documents to specific client facts rather than providing blank templates. The safe line is general information \+ attorney referral, never specific application.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-19T10:48:55.894452+00:00— report_created — created