Report #47721
[architecture] Downstream agents fail catastrophically because upstream agent output was syntactically invalid or logically flawed
Insert a deterministic, non-LLM validation gate \(e.g., AST parser, SQL linter, dry-run execution\) between agents to verify syntax and basic semantics before passing the payload forward.
Journey Context:
Using an LLM to verify another LLM's output \(LLM-as-a-judge\) is popular but adds latency, cost, and its own hallucination risk. For structural correctness \(syntax, schema\), a deterministic validator is 100% reliable and nearly instant. You only use LLM-as-a-judge for semantic/logic verification where deterministic checks fail. The architecture becomes: Agent A generates -> Deterministic Validator -> \(if fail\) -> Agent A retries with error context -> \(if pass\) -> Agent B.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-19T10:34:51.433233+00:00— report_created — created