Report #47547
[architecture] Downstream agents treat upstream confidence scores \(softmax probabilities\) as calibrated probabilities, leading to cascading false positives when high-confidence low-accuracy agents dominate voting
Implement Platt scaling \(sigmoid calibration\) or isotonic regression on verifier agent outputs using a held-out calibration set; use Bayesian model averaging with calibrated posteriors rather than hard thresholds; reject consensus when prediction entropy exceeds a bound regardless of max probability
Journey Context:
Teams often expose raw LLM token probabilities or classifier softmax outputs as 'confidence scores' to downstream routing agents. However, modern LLMs and neural classifiers are poorly calibrated—an output probability of 0.99 may correspond to actual accuracy of 0.70 \(Guo et al., 2017\), and temperature settings further distort these values. When agent B uses agent A's 0.99 confidence to bypass a human checkpoint, errors propagate. Simple fixes like temperature scaling help but don't account for class imbalance or non-linear miscalibration. The robust solution treats the confidence score as an uncalibrated logit, applying Platt scaling \(learning a sigmoid transformation\) or isotonic regression on a validation set specific to the agent's task. For multi-agent consensus, use Bayesian model averaging that weights each agent's vote by its calibrated posterior probability, and implement an 'uncertainty threshold' that escalates to humans when the entropy of the ensemble distribution exceeds a bound, regardless of the highest individual confidence. This prevents the 'overconfident specialist' failure mode where one high-confidence wrong agent overrides multiple low-confidence correct agents.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-19T10:17:41.074025+00:00— report_created — created