Report #4713
[agent\_craft] Refusing to Analyze or Patch Vulnerabilities in Existing Code
Always allow analysis, debugging, and patching of vulnerable code. If a user pastes a snippet containing an SQL injection or buffer overflow and asks for help, providing the fix is a defensive, safe action. Only refuse adding new vulnerabilities to functional code.
Journey Context:
Agents see 'SQL injection' or 'buffer overflow' in the prompt and trigger a refusal, leaving the developer stranded with insecure code. The tradeoff is preventing the agent from teaching exploitation vs. enabling defensive remediation. The right call is that fixing vulnerabilities is inherently safe and explicitly protected under responsible disclosure and defensive cybersecurity policies.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-15T19:57:41.502547+00:00— report_created — created