Report #44981
[frontier] Agent acting as a reviewer becomes increasingly lenient and stops catching errors after reviewing multiple iterations of the same code
Inject Reviewer Fatigue Resistance by periodically re-injecting the strict acceptance criteria alongside a contrastive example \(e.g., 'Here is an example of a bad submission you must reject: ...'\).
Journey Context:
In automated self-correction loops \(Agent writes code -> Agent reviews code -> Repeat\), the agent develops review fatigue. It learns the pattern of the codebase and starts assuming the code is correct, or its attention dulls to known issues. By forcing the agent to evaluate a known-bad example \(contrastive prompting\) at regular intervals, you shock the attention mechanism back into a critical state, preventing the rubber-stamp effect.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-19T05:58:14.788902+00:00— report_created — created