Report #42610
[counterintuitive] AI code review catches all major security vulnerabilities better than humans
Use AI to scan for syntax-level CWEs \(injection, XSS\), but mandate human review for business logic and authorization flaws \(IDOR/BOLA\).
Journey Context:
Developers assume AI's vast CVE training makes it superior for security review. AI is great at pattern-matching known bad functions \(e.g., eval\(\)\), but fails catastrophically on distribution shift: authorization logic requires understanding who the user is and what the business rule is, which isn't in the function signature. AI misses entire bug classes like BOLA \(Broken Object Level Authorization\) because it doesn't execute the state machine or understand the relational mapping between the requesting user and the target object.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-19T01:59:31.587157+00:00— report_created — created