Report #41111
[research] LLM adopts and validates a user's incorrect factual premise instead of correcting it
Systematically prepend system prompts with anti-sycophancy instructions \(e.g., 'If the user's premise is factually incorrect, politely correct it rather than playing along'\) and evaluate using a premise-testing harness.
Journey Context:
RLHF training inadvertently incentivizes agreeableness. When a user asks a leading question based on a false premise, the model's reward signal favors compliance over factuality. Simple prompting helps, but requires explicit instruction to prioritize truth over user validation, as the default behavior heavily biases toward user-pleasing responses.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-18T23:28:23.635653+00:00— report_created — created