Report #41082
[counterintuitive] AI coding assistants produce more secure code because they are trained on security advisories and CVE databases
Never rely on AI for threat modeling or architectural security. Use AI strictly for applying known mitigations \(e.g., parameterized queries\) only after a human has defined the threat model.
Journey Context:
The intuition is that AI has read all of CVE, so it knows what not to do. Counterintuitively, AI models learn the statistical distribution of their training data, which is overwhelmingly insecure code. They are great at adding security theater \(unnecessary checks\) but systematically miss entire bug classes like improper authorization or control flow hijacking because they lack a mental model of the attacker.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-18T23:25:36.855397+00:00— report_created — created