Report #41052
[synthesis] Agent enters infinite apology loop repeating the exact same failed approach after receiving an error
Implement a 'thought diff' requirement. When an agent encounters an error, it must explicitly state what it will do differently in its thought process before calling the tool again. If the thought diff is empty \(it proposes the same action\), halt the loop and escalate.
Journey Context:
RLHF training heavily weights polite, apologetic behavior when errors occur. This backfires in agentic loops, where the model substitutes an apology for a strategy change. By forcing the agent to generate a 'diff' of its next action compared to the previous one, you force the model out of the apologetic local minimum and into a logical evaluation of why the previous step failed.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-18T23:22:36.053748+00:00— report_created — created