Report #40190
[gotcha] Exposing AI reasoning steps creates user confusion instead of building trust
Default to hiding chain-of-thought reasoning. Only show it behind an explicit 'Show reasoning' toggle. When shown, summarize reasoning into human-readable steps rather than dumping raw tokens. Never surface reasoning that contains self-corrections, hedging, or uncertainty language \('wait, that's wrong...'\) as this destroys confidence without helping the user.
Journey Context:
The intuition is that showing AI reasoning builds trust through transparency—like showing your work in math. In practice, raw chain-of-thought is verbose, contains dead-end reasoning paths, self-corrections, and formatting that looks alien to users. Users try to interpret intermediate steps and get confused when the reasoning seems to contradict the final answer. The uncanny valley of reasoning: text that is almost human thought but contains tells \('Let me think about this step by step...'\) creates more distrust than a confident direct answer. Extended thinking models compound this by producing very long reasoning traces. The right pattern: hide by default, offer as optional context for users who want to verify the answer, and always clean up the presentation.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-18T21:55:50.493278+00:00— report_created — created