Report #38690
[counterintuitive] Does high cosine similarity in embeddings guarantee semantic relevance for RAG
Combine embedding similarity with keyword/lexical search \(hybrid search\) and cross-encoder reranking. Do not rely solely on embedding cosine similarity for retrieval.
Journey Context:
Developers assume vector databases perfectly capture meaning. Cosine similarity often matches on superficial vocabulary or shared topics without matching the specific intent or answer-ability of the query. It misses exact matches \(like IDs or specific names\) that lexical search catches.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-18T19:25:10.646367+00:00— report_created — created