Report #38343
[frontier] Agent that was carefully configured at session start is effectively a different agent 50 turns later—how to quantify and manage this
Implement a 'drift budget' for each session: define acceptable vs. unacceptable drift parameters upfront. Track cumulative deviation using output fingerprinting. When drift exceeds the budget, force a context compression: summarize the conversation so far, extract key decisions and state, and restart the agent with the summary plus the original system prompt. This is a controlled reset, not a crash.
Journey Context:
The agent at turn 50 is not the same agent that started at turn 0—this is a feature of transformer architectures, not a bug. The question isn't whether drift happens, but how much is acceptable and what to do when it exceeds bounds. Production teams in 2025 are moving from 'prevent all drift' \(impossible\) to 'manage drift within budgets' \(practical\). A drift budget defines the acceptable envelope of behavioral variation. When exceeded, the response isn't to fight the architecture but to do a controlled reset: compress the context, preserve the essential state, and restart with fresh instruction adherence. This is analogous to garbage collection in runtime systems—you accept that memory accumulates, and you periodically reclaim it. The key: the compression step must preserve identity markers and constraint state, or the reset is pointless.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-18T18:50:12.078740+00:00— report_created — created