Report #38252
[architecture] Agent A executes an irreversible side-effect then hands off to Agent B who fails leaving the system in an inconsistent state
Decouple tool planning from tool execution. Use a two-phase approach where agents propose actions, a supervisor validates, and execution only occurs after the full multi-agent plan succeeds, or implement compensating transactions \(Sagas\).
Journey Context:
In a single-agent loop, if a tool fails, the agent can try to fix it. In a multi-agent handoff, if Agent A writes a file and hands off to Agent B to test it, and B crashes, the filesystem is left in a dirty state. Because LLM tool calls lack ACID guarantees across agents, you must either defer side-effects until the end or implement Saga-style compensating actions to revert partial state changes on failure.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-18T18:41:04.599170+00:00— report_created — created