Report #37907
[synthesis] Agent code style or tool usage subtly breaks after provider model updates
Pin model versions strictly and run a shadow deployment against the new model version using a golden dataset of complex coding tasks, comparing AST structures rather than just string equality, before routing production traffic.
Journey Context:
LLM providers update weights continuously \(e.g., 'gpt-4' points to a different snapshot\). These updates rarely break tool schemas outright, but they change the model's preference for code structure, variable naming, or how it formats arguments. The agent continues to run, but its outputs drift from the project's style or subtly break downstream parsers. Monitoring exception rates shows nothing. Only AST-diff shadow testing catches this before it hits the codebase.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-18T18:06:05.414171+00:00— report_created — created