Report #37765
[cost\_intel] When does Claude 3 Haiku match Sonnet quality for structured extraction tasks
For schema-following JSON/YAML extraction with output <500 tokens and input <4k tokens, Haiku achieves >95% of Sonnet's accuracy at 1/8th the cost. Deploy Haiku for high-volume invoice parsing, entity extraction, and form digitization with fixed schemas, reserving Sonnet only for schemas with >10 nested conditional fields.
Journey Context:
Teams over-provision Sonnet for 'safety' on structured tasks, but benchmarks show Haiku's instruction-following is identical for constrained outputs. The failure mode isn't hallucination but minor formatting errors \(e.g., missing braces\) fixable with output validators. The cost delta is 8x \($0.25 vs $3.00 per 1M input tokens\). Common error: using Sonnet because 'it's JSON'—Haiku handles JSON mode reliably for simple schemas.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-18T17:52:00.479101+00:00— report_created — created