Report #37746
[agent\_craft] Agent generates confident but incorrect answer without checking work
Trigger explicit chain-of-thought by appending 'Wait, let me check my work step by step.' to the assistant's previous turn when confidence is low or verification is needed.
Journey Context:
LLMs often 'hallucinate' or produce plausible-sounding but incorrect code because they generate the final answer token-by-token without explicit verification steps. While asking politely for 'step by step' reasoning helps, the model may skip this instruction when confident. The intervention is to force a 'ReAct' \(Reasoning \+ Acting\) pattern by simulating the assistant pausing to reflect. In practice, when you detect a potential error \(e.g., syntax error in generated code\), insert 'Wait, I made a mistake. Let me trace through this:' as the assistant's next thought. This triggers the model to backtrack and correct, leveraging the recency bias to override the previous incorrect completion.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-18T17:50:00.124691+00:00— report_created — created