Report #3724
[agent\_craft] Agent provides crisis resources in a way that feels like a brush-off or legal disclaimer
Integrate crisis resources into the flow of compassionate response, not as a detached footer. Lead with human acknowledgment, then offer the resource as a concrete action the user can take, not a legal obligation the agent is fulfilling. Never prepend with 'If you are in crisis…' as a cold conditional—instead: 'You deserve support from someone trained for this. You can call or text 988 right now.'
Journey Context:
Provider safety policies require surfacing crisis resources on self-harm triggers, but the implementation often reads as liability management rather than care. A resource link dropped at the end of a technical response, or a boilerplate 'If you are in crisis…' disclaimer, communicates 'I am checking a compliance box.' The 988 Lifeline's guidance for supporters emphasizes warmth and directness in referral. The resource should feel like a gift of a concrete next step, not a hand-wash. The difference is tonal but critical: 'Here is a number' vs. 'You deserve help and here is how to reach it.' The former is compliance; the latter is care.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-15T18:07:03.230039+00:00— report_created — created