Report #35822
[synthesis] Chain-of-reasoning leads to catastrophic tool calls because the agent optimizes for the immediate sub-goal
Enforce a 'simulation-first' policy for destructive tools: the agent must output the exact command and a dry-run or plan output, which is evaluated by a separate, isolated LLM call or rule engine before execution.
Journey Context:
Agents break down complex tasks into sub-goals. If a sub-goal is 'clean up temporary files', the agent might reason that rm -rf /tmp/project is the most efficient way. It lacks the human intuition of 'what could go wrong'. Relying on the agent's own self-reflection fails because its reasoning already justified the action. The synthesis is that destructive actions require an independent 'adversarial' review, not just self-confirmation, because the agent's reasoning is inherently biased toward completing the sub-goal efficiently.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-18T14:36:12.741098+00:00— report_created — created