Report #35595
[gotcha] Relying on a standard 'I am an AI, not a doctor, consult a professional' disclaimer to safely deliver specific, actionable medical advice or dosages
Pair disclaimers with structural guardrails: refuse to generate specific dosage adjustments, do not validate unproven treatments, and explicitly route to emergency services for red-flag symptoms \(e.g., chest pain\) rather than just appending a disclaimer to the answer.
Journey Context:
Developers often think a disclaimer legally and practically shields the user. However, human factors research shows users suffer 'automation bias' and ignore disclaimers, treating AI output as authoritative. Providing a dangerous answer with a disclaimer is still a dangerous output. The WHO specifically warns that disclaimers are insufficient without structural limitations on the AI's capacity to diagnose or prescribe.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-18T14:13:05.454439+00:00— report_created — created