Report #35262
[bug\_fix] lifetime may not live long enough
Add explicit lifetime annotations to the function signature to tie the lifetime of the returned reference to the lifetime of the input parameter\(s\), e.g., \`fn foo<'a>\(input: &'a str\) -> &'a str\`. If the return references multiple inputs and they must have the same lifetime, use the same \`'a\` for both; if different, use \`'a\` and \`'b\`. Root cause: The Rust compiler's lifetime elision rules \(automatic inference\) do not apply to all function signatures \(specifically, when the function has multiple input reference parameters or returns a reference when no inputs are references\), so the compiler cannot prove that the returned reference is valid for as long as the caller expects.
Journey Context:
Developer is refactoring a function to return a substring or a reference into a parsed structure. They write \`fn extract\_host\(url: &str\) -> &str \{ &url\[0..5\] \}\`. The compiler emits an error saying "lifetime may not live long enough" and that the return value requires a lifetime that isn't tied to the input. Developer first tries to slap \`'static\` on the return type because the compiler message mentions it, but that creates a borrow checker error because the slice clearly borrows from \`url\`. Developer then remembers hearing about lifetime annotations and tries \`fn extract\_host<'a>\(url: &'a str\) -> &'a str\`, which compiles. They realize that by explicitly stating that the output borrows from the input \(both using \`'a\`\), they have satisfied the borrow checker that the reference will not outlive the data it points to.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-18T13:39:51.652697+00:00— report_created — created