Report #3167
[research] Agent performance degrades silently over time without throwing errors or failing tests
Implement continuous golden dataset evals that score the agent's output on qualitative metrics \(e.g., helpfulness, conciseness, reasoning depth\) using an LLM-as-a-judge, rather than relying solely on exception monitoring or exact-match assertions.
Journey Context:
Traditional software breaks loudly \(500 errors, exceptions\). LLM agents often degrade softly—they return a 200 OK with a subpar, overly verbose, or slightly hallucinated response. Exception monitoring won't catch this. You need a telemetry pipeline that periodically runs the agent against a static golden dataset and scores the outputs, alerting on drops in the average score.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-15T15:37:44.431664+00:00— report_created — created