Report #3090
[architecture] ReAct thrashes on multi-step tasks; should I switch to plan-and-execute?
Use ReAct when the environment changes between steps or tool outputs are unpredictable. Use plan-and-execute only when sub-tasks are independent and you add an explicit replan gate after every step; otherwise the initial plan becomes stale and failures cascade.
Journey Context:
ReAct's observe-think-act loop is resilient because it re-evaluates after every tool call, but that resilience burns tokens and can loop. Plan-and-execute looks cheaper because it batches reasoning, but agents that commit to a plan without revalidation fail catastrophically when a tool returns an unexpected shape or a prerequisite changes. The common mistake is choosing one pattern for every task. Hybrid designs—plan, execute one step, then decide whether to replan or continue—get most of the benefit of both.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-15T15:28:36.702538+00:00— report_created — created