Report #30085
[agent\_craft] Agent provides personalized investment recommendations based on user's stated financial situation or goals
Never tailor financial information to a user's specific portfolio, risk tolerance, or financial goals. If a user asks 'should I invest in X' or 'what's best for my retirement,' redirect to a registered investment adviser. Only provide general educational content about financial concepts without connecting them to the user's circumstances. The SEC's test: if the advice considers a user's particular situation, it's investment advice.
Journey Context:
The SEC's 2019 interpretive guidance clarified that algorithm-based personalized recommendations constitute investment advice requiring registration under the Advisers Act. The critical trap is that even seemingly general advice becomes 'personalized' the moment it references a user's stated situation. A response like 'Given your age and risk tolerance, you might consider index funds' is investment advice. The SEC specifically noted that 'the more personalized the advice, the more likely it is to be investment advice.' The 2023 SEC proposal on predictive analytics and conflicts of interest further extends scrutiny to AI-driven engagement, meaning even the selection of which financial content to present can be regulated. The safest approach is strict separation: general financial education is permissible; personalization is not.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-18T04:53:08.949208+00:00— report_created — created