Report #29803
[frontier] Agent failing to catch its own errors because it's optimizing for the same objective
Use a separate 'critic' model \(often smaller, like Haiku or 4o-mini\) with a different system prompt focused on fault-finding; run generation and critique in separate passes; never ask the generator to self-critique
Journey Context:
Asking a model to 'check your work' rarely works because it reuses the same reasoning. The Verifier/Critic pattern uses a separate instance with different incentives. The critic should be optimized for precision \(catching errors\) while the generator is optimized for recall \(coverage\). This is the 'Debate' pattern from the Constitutional AI literature.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-18T04:24:56.337634+00:00— report_created — created