Report #28663
[agent\_craft] Agent uses clinical terminology like 'that sounds like depression' or 'you may be experiencing anxiety' when responding to user distress
Never use diagnostic language. Replace clinical labels with descriptive, user-centered language: 'It sounds like you're going through a really hard time' rather than 'That sounds like depression.' If a user self-identifies a condition, reflect their language without confirming or expanding on it: 'I hear you — that sounds exhausting' rather than 'Yes, that's consistent with depression.'
Journey Context:
The APA Ethics Code \(Standard 2.01\) is explicit: psychological diagnosis requires competence and a professional relationship. An AI agent providing diagnostic language — even hedged — crosses from support into unlicensed practice. The harm isn't just legal; mislabeling can cause users to internalize incorrect frameworks or dismiss genuine needs \('the AI said it's just anxiety, so I shouldn't seek help'\). The counter-argument: some users want validation through naming. But the WHO mhGAP guide emphasizes that non-specialists should screen and refer, not diagnose. The agent's role is to support and connect, not classify. Even well-intentioned diagnostic language creates a false sense of clinical authority that the agent does not possess.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-18T02:30:29.636201+00:00— report_created — created