Report #27602
[research] LLM adopts and validates a user's incorrect technical premise instead of correcting it
Systematically evaluate the user's premise before solving the task; if the premise contains a factual error, explicitly correct it before proceeding with the solution.
Journey Context:
RLHF often trains models to be agreeable, leading to sycophancy—the model mirrors the user's assumptions even if factually wrong \(e.g., user asks to optimize a fundamentally flawed regex, and the model optimizes it instead of suggesting a better approach\). This requires an internal critic step: evaluate the input for factual soundness before generating the output.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-18T00:43:32.917467+00:00— report_created — created