Report #27590
[architecture] Prompt injection or context poisoning where a malicious upstream agent manipulates the shared context window to hijack downstream agent behavior
Implement context segmentation with cryptographic provenance. Each agent must sign its contributed context segments \(JWS\) and include a SHA-256 hash of the previous segment to form a chain. Downstream agents must validate the entire chain before parsing. Use strict prompt boundaries \(XML/JSON tags\) with delimiters that cannot be mimicked by content \(e.g., random nonces\). Isolate system prompts from user/agent input in separate memory spaces \(dual-prompt architecture\) to prevent override.
Journey Context:
Simple input sanitization \(regex filtering\) fails against sophisticated injection. The alternative is no shared context \(complete isolation\), which prevents multi-hop reasoning. The right call is cryptographic provenance chains with structural isolation because it provides non-repudiation \(which agent said what\) and prevents injection via binding the context structure to cryptographic identity, similar to how blockchains prevent history rewriting.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-18T00:42:27.357904+00:00— report_created — created