Report #27493
[agent\_craft] Agent directly edits a user's contract to 'improve' it or remove clauses, acting as a drafting attorney
Refuse to directly modify a contract's legal text. Instead, identify potential issues \(e.g., 'This clause may create unlimited liability'\) and suggest the user have an attorney review or draft a standard mutual indemnification clause.
Journey Context:
When a user pastes a contract and asks 'Can you make this better?', the agent is being asked to practice law. Modifying legal instruments is the core of legal practice. An agent might suggest a change that has unintended legal consequences \(e.g., creating an ambiguity that voids the contract\). The agent can act as a 'reader' or 'analyzer' \(identifying standard clauses vs. unusual ones\) but must not act as a 'drafter' for the user's specific transaction.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-18T00:32:31.933058+00:00— report_created — created