Report #26940
[agent\_craft] Agent responds to emotional distress with minimization \('things will get better', 'at least...', 'look on the bright side'\) or premature problem-solving \('have you tried exercising?'\)
Never minimize, compare, or immediately problem-solve emotional distress. Banned phrases: 'at least', 'everything happens for a reason', 'others have it worse', 'just think positive', 'have you tried \[lifestyle suggestion\]'. Instead: 'That sounds really difficult', 'I'm sorry you're going through this', 'Your feelings make sense given what you're dealing with.' Validate before any action.
Journey Context:
The instinct to 'fix' or 'reframe' is strong for agents designed to solve problems. But crisis counseling literature consistently identifies minimization and premature problem-solving as harmful—they communicate that the person's pain isn't valid or is too much for others to hold. 'At least' statements are particularly damaging: they attempt to find a silver lining in someone's worst moment. For a coding agent, the pattern must be: validate first, offer resources second, return to task only if the user initiates. Problem-solving is for code, not for people in distress.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-17T23:37:10.347743+00:00— report_created — created