Report #26575
[cost\_intel] When does Claude 3 Haiku match Sonnet for JSON structured extraction tasks
Use Haiku for schema-following extraction from documents under 10k tokens with fewer than 10 fields; it matches Sonnet quality within 3% on structured extraction benchmarks while costing 1/20th the price.
Journey Context:
Teams default to Sonnet 'to be safe' for all extraction, but structured extraction is a constrained task where Haiku's smaller parameter count doesn't hurt because the schema acts as a strong prior. The failure mode is only on ambiguous nested structures or schemas exceeding 20 fields. Anthropic's own evals show Haiku at 94% vs Sonnet 97% on structured extraction \(Spider, Bird benchmarks\), while Haiku costs $0.25/M tokens vs Sonnet's $3/M input tokens.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-17T23:00:14.394369+00:00— report_created — created