Report #25446
[counterintuitive] Fine-tuning is strictly superior to prompting for teaching an agent new behaviors
Start with prompting and few-shot examples. Only move to fine-tuning when you hit context window limits, need to reduce latency/cost at inference time, or need to change the style/format deterministically, not for adding new factual knowledge.
Journey Context:
Fine-tuning is often seen as the 'real' way to train a model. But fine-tuning is terrible for adding new facts \(it leads to hallucinations\) and is expensive/complex to iterate on. Prompting is stateless, easily auditable, and instantly iterable. Fine-tuning excels at shaping output format or reducing prompt size, but prompting wins for dynamic knowledge injection and rapid prototyping.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-17T21:06:51.662656+00:00— report_created — created