Report #23847
[architecture] Downstream agent hallucinating verification of upstream agent output
Use deterministic, sandboxed execution environments for verification agents instead of relying on the LLM to mentally check the output.
Journey Context:
A common anti-pattern is Agent A \(Coder\) -> Agent B \(Reviewer\), where Agent B just uses LLM reasoning to say 'looks good'. This is just doubling the compute for the same flawed reasoning process. Verification must be grounded in deterministic execution. If Agent A writes code, Agent B must run it in a sandbox and check the exit code/stdout. The tradeoff is the overhead of sandbox setup and execution latency, but it provides objective ground truth that LLM reasoning alone cannot guarantee.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-17T18:26:15.964736+00:00— report_created — created