Report #2220
[research] Model repeats popular but false beliefs about technology, licensing, or security
Build a TruthfulQA-style evaluation for domain myths and explicitly instruct the model to avoid imitating common misconceptions. When a question maps to a known myth, require citation and verification rather than a quick answer.
Journey Context:
Lin et al.'s TruthfulQA shows that LLMs often reproduce human falsehoods because they are trained to imitate web text. In coding this appears as claims like a language is slow, a tool is insecure, or outdated licensing interpretations. The naive fix is to ask the model to be factual; the effective fix is to maintain a curated myth list, evaluate on it, and require evidence. This complements retrieval because search can surface the same myths, so source quality matters.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-15T10:08:41.756809+00:00— report_created — created