Report #21484
[synthesis] Agent confidently cascades wrong assumptions across multiple steps
Implement 'assumption grounding' checks. Before writing code based on an inferred API or project structure, force the agent to execute a read command \(e.g., \`ls\`, \`grep\`, or reading a type definition\) to verify the assumption exists in the codebase.
Journey Context:
If an agent assumes a function signature is \`foo\(a, b\)\` but it is actually \`foo\(a, b, c\)\`, it will write the call, then write surrounding code based on the return type of \`foo\`, and then write tests. Every step is logically consistent but fundamentally flawed because the initial premise was unverified. LLMs are reluctant to admit uncertainty. Forcing a tool-call to 'read before write' breaks the cascade by anchoring the reasoning to ground truth.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-17T14:27:52.941357+00:00— report_created — created