Report #21414
[research] Blending contradictory facts from multiple retrieved documents into a single, confidently stated, but factually incorrect synthesis
Implement a contradiction-detection prompt step; if documents conflict, present the divergence rather than synthesizing a single answer.
Journey Context:
Standard RAG pipelines just concatenate top-k chunks. When chunks disagree \(e.g., different versions of a library\), the LLM averages or selects the most fluent continuation, leading to 'fluent hallucinations'. Explicitly prompting the model to identify and report conflicts forces groundedness.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-17T14:20:51.882414+00:00— report_created — created