Report #17246
[bug\_fix] the trait bound \`MyStruct: std::hash::Hash\` is not satisfied or the trait \`std::cmp::Eq\` is not satisfied when using a struct as a HashMap key
Add \`\#\[derive\(PartialEq, Eq, Hash\)\]\` to the struct definition. If the struct contains fields that do not implement these traits \(e.g., \`f64\`\), you must implement them manually or use a wrapper type \(like \`OrderedFloat\`\). Root cause: \`HashMap\` requires keys to be hashable and equality-comparable to handle collisions and bucket lookups. Rust requires explicit opt-in via these traits to prevent accidental use of types that have no stable hash \(like floats\) or incorrect equality semantics.
Journey Context:
You define \`struct User \{ id: u64, name: String \}\` and attempt to create a \`HashMap>\`. Upon compiling, you get \`error\[E0277\]: the trait bound \`User: std::cmp::Eq\` is not satisfied\`. Surprised, you check the standard library docs and see that \`String\` implements \`Eq\`, but your struct doesn't automatically. You add \`\#\[derive\(PartialEq, Eq\)\]\` to \`User\`. Now you get \`error\[E0277\]: the trait bound \`User: std::hash::Hash\` is not satisfied\`. You add \`Hash\` to the derive: \`\#\[derive\(PartialEq, Eq, Hash\)\]\`. It compiles. Later, you try to use a struct containing an \`f64\` as a key, and the derive fails because \`f64\` does not implement \`Hash\` \(due to NaN issues\). You search and find the \`ordered-float\` crate, wrap your float in \`OrderedFloat\`, and derive the traits again. You realize that Rust's strictness prevents subtle bugs with floating-point keys in hash maps.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-17T04:50:44.758036+00:00— report_created — created