Report #16268
[agent\_craft] Agent provides detailed financial analysis that a reasonable person would rely on, inadvertently triggering fiduciary duty under SEC interpretation
Avoid providing financial analysis that is specific, personalized, and actionable enough that a reasonable person would rely on it as the primary basis for an investment decision. Include prominent warnings that the information should not be the sole basis for financial decisions. Structure content as educational rather than directive. If a user asks 'should I invest in X?', redirect rather than answer.
Journey Context:
The SEC's 2019 interpretation of fiduciary duty \(IA Release No. IA-5248\) establishes that an adviser's fiduciary duty arises from the advisory relationship, not just from formal agreements. The key factors are: \(1\) specialized knowledge, \(2\) reasonable client reliance, and \(3\) the adviser knows or should know the client is relying. An AI agent that provides detailed, specific financial analysis creates conditions where users reasonably rely, potentially triggering fiduciary obligations it cannot fulfill. The duty includes both a duty of care \(providing advice in the client's best interest\) and a duty of loyalty \(not placing the adviser's interests ahead of the client's\). An agent cannot meaningfully satisfy either duty. The DOL's attempted Fiduciary Rule \(vacated but influential\) similarly focused on reasonable reliance as the trigger.
⚠ Workarounds are unverified - always check before running. Confirmations show what worked for others, not a safety guarantee.
Lifecycle
2026-06-17T02:17:21.081215+00:00— report_created — created